{"id":442,"date":"2010-03-08T18:47:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-08T22:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/?p=442"},"modified":"2010-03-08T18:47:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-08T22:47:00","slug":"slate-why-stupak-is-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/?p=442","title":{"rendered":"Slate: Why Stupak is Wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2246905\/pagenum\/all\/#p2\">Slate: Why Stupak is Wrong<\/a><br \/>Because this keeps coming up and needs addressed, Slate&#8217;s Timothy Noah explains:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you go to Page 2069 through Page 2078 [of the Senate bill],&#8221; Stupak <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.abcnews.com\/george\/2010\/03\/without-abortion-changes-stupak-will-defeat-health-care-were-prepared-to-take-responsibility.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">told<\/a> George Stephanopoulos on March 4 on Good Morning America, &#8220;you will find in there the federal government would directly subsidize abortions, plus every enrollee in the Office of Personnel Management-enrolled plan, every enrollee has to pay a minimum of one dollar per month toward reproductive rights, which includes abortions.&#8221; Stupak is here referring to the exchanges created under health reform and to a nonprofit plan managed by the Office of Personnel Management that would be sold through the exchanges. The latter was a consolation prize to supporters of a public-option government health insurance program that didn&#8217;t make it into the bill.<br \/>Let&#8217;s go to Page 2069 through Page 2078 of the <a href=\"http:\/\/democrats.senate.gov\/reform\/patient-protection-affordable-care-act-as-passed.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Senate-passed bill<\/a>. It says, &#8220;If a qualified plan provides [abortion] coverage \u2026 the issuer of the plan shall not use any amount attributable to [health reform&#8217;s government-funding mechanisms] for purposes of paying for such services.&#8221; (This is on Page 2072.) That seems pretty straightforward. No government funding for abortions. (Except in the case of rape, incest, or a threat to the mother&#8217;s life\u2014the same exceptions granted under <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nchla.org\/datasource\/ifactsheets\/4FSHydeAm22a.08.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">current law<\/a>.) If a health insurer selling through the exchanges wishes to offer abortion coverage\u2014the federal government may not require it to do so, and the state where the exchange is located may (the bill states) pass a law forbidding it to do so\u2014then the insurer must collect from each enrollee (regardless of sex or age) a separate payment to cover abortion. <br \/>The insurer must keep this pool of money separate to ensure it won&#8217;t be commingled with so much as a nickel of government subsidy. (This is on Pages 2072-2074.) Stupak is right that anyone who enrolls through the exchange in a health plan that covers abortions must pay a nominal sum (defined on Page 125 of the bill as not less than &#8220;$1 per enrollee, per month&#8221;) into the specially segregated abortion fund. But Stupak is wrong to say this applies to &#8220;every<br \/>enrollee.&#8221; If an enrollee objects morally to spending one un-government-subsidized dollar to cover abortion, then he or she can simply choose a different health plan offered through the exchange, one that doesn&#8217;t cover abortions. (Under the Senate bill, every insurance exchange must offer at least one abortion-free health plan.)<br \/>One dollar exceeds health insurers&#8217; actual cost in providing abortion coverage. In fact, it&#8217;s entirely symbolic. The law stipulates that in calculating abortions&#8217; cost, insurers may consider how much they spend to finance abortions but not how much they save in foregone prenatal care, delivery, or postnatal care. (This is on Pages 2074-2075.) This is to keep insurers from pondering the gruesome reality\u2014one they surely know already\u2014that covering abortions actually saves them money. For health insurers, the true cost of abortion coverage is less than zero, because hospitals and doctors charge less to perform abortions than they do to tend pregnant women before, during, and after childbirth. (Ironically, only the Senate bill\u2014not the House bill\u2014provides some small counterweight to this calculus by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usccb.org\/healthcare\/Issuechart.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">increasing aid<\/a> for adoption assistance.) <br \/>What really rankles Stupak (and the bishops) isn&#8217;t that the Senate bill commits taxpayer dollars to funding abortion. Rather, it&#8217;s that the Senate bill commits taxpayer dollars to people<br \/>who buy private insurance policies that happen to cover abortion at nominal cost to the purchaser (even the poorest of the poor can spare $1 a month) and no cost at all to the insurer. Stupak and the bishops don&#8217;t have a beef with government spending. They have a beef with market economics.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Slate: Why Stupak is WrongBecause this keeps coming up and needs addressed, Slate&#8217;s Timothy Noah explains: &#8220;If you go to Page 2069 through Page 2078 [of the Senate bill],&#8221; Stupak &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/?p=442\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Slate: Why Stupak is Wrong&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care-reform-debate-abortion-controversy"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}