{"id":593,"date":"2009-05-31T23:36:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-01T03:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/?p=593"},"modified":"2009-05-31T23:36:00","modified_gmt":"2009-06-01T03:36:00","slug":"annals-of-medicine-the-cost-conundrum-reporting-essays-the-new-yorker","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/?p=593","title":{"rendered":"Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker"},"content":{"rendered":"

Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker<\/a>:<\/p>\n

A damning look by Atul Gawande at the way we pay for medical care in America. The final three paragraphs of this must read article.<\/i><\/p>\n

“Something even more worrisome is going on as well. In the war over the culture of medicine\u2014the war over whether our country\u2019s anchor model will be Mayo or McAllen\u2014the Mayo model is losing. In the sharpest economic downturn that our health system has faced in half a century, many people in medicine don\u2019t see why they should do the hard work of organizing themselves in ways that reduce waste and improve quality if it means sacrificing revenue.<\/p>\n

“In El Paso, the for-profit health-care executive told me, a few leading physicians recently followed McAllen\u2019s lead and opened their own centers for surgery and imaging. When I was in Tulsa a few months ago, a fellow-surgeon explained how he had made up for lost revenue by shifting his operations for well-insured patients to a specialty hospital that he partially owned while keeping his poor and uninsured patients at a nonprofit hospital in town. Even in Grand Junction, Michael Pramenko told me, \u201csome of the doctors are beginning to complain about \u2018leaving money on the table.\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n

“As America struggles to extend health-care coverage while curbing health-care costs, we face a decision that is more important than whether we have a public-insurance option, more important than whether we will have a single-payer system in the long run or a mixture of public and private insurance, as we do now. The decision is whether we are going to reward the leaders who are trying to build a new generation of Mayos and Grand Junctions. If we don\u2019t, McAllen won\u2019t be an outlier. It will be our future.”<\/p>\n

I went to the Dartmouth Atlas web site myself and found this interesting tid-bit:<\/i><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/i>
<\/i>
<\/i>I think it fits in well with the ethos described in Gawande’s article.
<\/i>
It is much easier to continue aggressive treatment rather than spend time having an honest discussion about the benefits and burdens of continuing treatment.<\/i>
<\/i>
<\/i>
Thanks to whoever put the link up on the Howard Dean Webinar tonight!<\/i>
<\/i>
<\/i>
<\/i>
UPDATE: This recent Archives of Internal Medicine article is particularly apporpriate:
http:\/\/archinte.ama-assn.org\/cgi\/content\/short\/169\/10\/954<\/a><\/i>

This also, perversely, can make the hospital statistics in mortality look good, as well. As an intensivist, I can get almost ANYONE out of the the ICU and subsequently out of the hospital if I ignore the true outcome for the patient and the family: additional suffering, minimal prolongation of a life at its end, and so on.<\/p>\n

My colleagues who do practice best EOL practices know that our ICU and hospital mortality numbers suffer, but I have no doubt that having honest discussions with my patients and families is the right thing to do. You may have heard this for your patients, \u201cThanks for the straight talk, Doc,\u201d or \u201cNobody talked to me about my prognosis before.\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, this is not new information, but we still need to do better as physicians:http:\/\/www.chestjournal.org\/content\/128\/1\/465.full?ck=nck<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker: A damning look by Atul Gawande at the way we pay for medical care in America. The final … Continue reading “Annals of Medicine: The Cost Conundrum: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[110,13,108,17,67,56,47,85],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atul-gawande","category-end-of-life-care","category-health-care-reform-debate","category-medical-professionalism","category-must-read","category-payment-reform","category-physician-income","category-practice-variation"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/593\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.cmhughesmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}