REP. TODD TIAHRT: SCHIP IS POLITICAL TUG-OF-WAR

Kansas.com 09/26/2007

“Ensuring the welfare of America’s children should be top priority among congressional members. That’s why I supported SCHIP when it was created by the Republican Congress in 1997. I would continue to offer my support this year; however, Democrats have politicized this program and used it as a platform to take one giant step toward a national socialized health care system.”

It’s always disappointing when a member of Congress argues against the straw man of “socialized medicine” when nobody is advocating for a socialized system in which the government owns all parts of the health system. It can work: look at the VA, and imagine the VA if it weren’t underfunded and forced to outsource parts of its responsibilities to those wonderful “privateers” (remember the Walter Reed debacle – outsourcing).

But virtually nobody wants socialized medicine. Virtually everyone whom I’ve ever heard advocate for universal coverage advocates for a single payer system where we, the taxpayers, pay for our health insurance via taxes, and it is administered through a system like Medicare is right now. Medicare contracts with private companies that operate under Medicare rules (our rules, by the way, Congress sets the rules) and pay hospitals, doctors, etc. No socialized medicine, thank you; Medicare for all, please.

MAPLight.org | Money and Politics: Illuminating the Connection

MAPLight.org Money and Politics: Illuminating the Connection: “MAPLight.org brings together campaign contributions and how legislators vote, providing an unprecedented window into the connections between money and politics.”

h/t to Mr. Pogue:

From the Desk of David Pogue, New York Times,

Following the Money Trail Online

By DAVID POGUE

Published: May 24, 2007

The first step to solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.

That’s what I keep telling myself, anyway, to avoid becoming depressed by Maplight.org.

It’s a new Web site with a very simple mission: to correlate lawmakers’ voting records with the money they’ve accepted from special-interest groups.

All of this is public information. All of it has been available for decades. Other sites, including OpenSecrets.org, expose who’s giving how much to whom. But nobody has ever revealed the relationship between money given and votes cast to quite such a startling effect….

All I can say is, “Let the games begin!”

More from Open Secrets

More from Open Secrets
Top Contributors to Federal Candidates and Parties: Health: “Health: Top Contributors to Federal Candidates and Parties “

Donor Profiles: The American Medical Association (AMA) represents medical doctors across the country, promotes standards in care, and publishes a number of medical journals. The association has traditionally supported Republican candidates, agreeing with the GOP on such issues as medical malpractice reform. But over the last few years, the AMA has also begun to shift support to the Democrats, favoring their attempts to pass patients’ rights legislation and expand Medicare payments. “

And just for fun:
Top Contributors to Federal Candidates and Parties: Misc Business:
“Misc Business: Top Contributors to Federal Candidates and Parties “

NEJM — Campaign Contributions from the American Medical Political Action Committee to Members of Congress — For or Against the Public Health?

1994 article on AMPAC contributions:
NEJM — Campaign Contributions from the American Medical Political Action Committee to Members of Congress — For or Against the Public Health?