International Comparison: Access & Timeliness

From the Commonwealth Fund:
International Comparison: Access & Timeliness:

“U.S. patients reported relatively longer waiting times for doctor appointments when they were sick, but relatively shorter waiting times to be seen at the ER, see a specialist, and have elective surgery. Specifically:

The percentage of U.S. patients who waited six days or more for a doctor appointment when sick was not significantly different from the rate in Canada (23% v. 36%), the worst-performing country.

Only 47 percent of U.S. patients were able to see a doctor on the same or next day when sick, versus 61 percent to 81 percent of patients in the four better-performing nations.

U.S. patients were less likely than patients in Canada (12% v. 24%) but more likely than patients in Germany (4%) to wait four hours or more to be seen in the emergency department.

U.S. patients were less likely than patients in four countries (except Germany) to wait four weeks or longer to see a specialist (23% v. 40%–60%) or to wait four months or longer for elective surgery (8% v. 19%–41%) (Schoen et al. 2005).”

Additionally, Americans are less likey to have a regular doctor, less likely to get prescriptions filled, less likely to get follow-up care, less likely to keep a doctor long-term, and have a harder time getting taken care of nights and weekends.

It speaks for itself.

Health Blog : Safety Net Frays as Hospitals Shift Resources From Poor

Health Blog : Safety Net Frays as Hospitals Shift Resources From Poor:

“An increase in the number of uninsured patients and competition from well-heeled hospitals is putting pressure on safety net hospitals to reduce services for the poor, according to a report by the Center for Studying Health System Change published online today in the journal Health Affairs. [cmhmd:requires subscription]

The analysis, taken from the Center’s ongoing survey of 12 metropolitan areas, comes as nonprofit hospitals are under increasing scrutiny for the amount of free care they provide for the poor. Some critics charge nonprofit hospitals enjoy billions of dollars in tax exemptions without providing offsetting amounts of charity care.”

And yet, if you ask the typical advocate for the status quo, we have no access problems, no rationing of healthcare here in the US.


Go to the WSJ blog for the rest, it covers things nicely.

They Know What’s in Your Medicine Cabinet

They Know What’s in Your Medicine Cabinet:
“That prescription you just picked up at the drugstore could hurt your chances of getting health insurance.

An untold number of people have been rejected for medical coverage for a reason they never could have guessed: Insurance companies are using huge, commercially available prescription databases to screen out applicants based on their drug purchases.

Privacy and consumer advocates warn that the information can easily be misinterpreted or knowingly misused. At a minimum, the practice is adding another layer of anxiety to a marketplace that many consumers already find baffling. ‘It’s making it harder to find insurance for people,’ says Jay Horowitz, an independent insurance agent in Overland Park, Kan.”

This would be funny if it weren’t so disturbing.

We’ve been having a running joke at our house that our pharmacist is going to think I’m the most diseased man on the planet because I keep getting medications from my local grocer’s $4 drug list for my dog!

I’ve been getting him antibiotics, oral and ophthalmic and topical, in a wide variety, steroids, and other stuff in my name because paying for these is far cheaper than at the vet’s! Now none of these have been charged to my insurer, I strictly pay cash, but clearly my name will be in the databases with all these drugs. So next time I have to switch plans….

While the U.S. Spends Heavily on Health Care, a Study Faults the Quality – NYTimes.com

While the U.S. Spends Heavily on Health Care, a Study Faults the Quality – NYTimes.com:

“In some cases, the nation’s progress was overshadowed by improvements in other industrialized countries, which typically have more centralized health systems, which makes it easier to put changes in place.

The United States, for example, has reduced the number of preventable deaths for people under the age of 75 to 110 deaths for every 100,000 people, compared with 115 deaths five years earlier, but other countries have made greater strides. As a result, the United States now ranks last in preventable mortality, just below Ireland and Portugal, according to the Commonwealth Fund’s analysis of World Health Organization data. The leader by that measure is France, followed by Japan and Australia.

Other countries worked hard to improve, according to the Commonwealth Fund researchers. Britain, for example, focused on steps like improving the performance of individual hospitals that had been the least successful in treating heart disease. The success is related to “really making a government priority to get top-quality care,” Ms. Davis said.”

The Commonwealtth Fund’s Report is here:
Why Not the Best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2008July 17, 2008 Volume 97
The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System

Falling Behind: Americans’ Access to Medical Care Deteriorates, 2003-2007 – RWJF

Falling Behind: Americans’ Access to Medical Care Deteriorates, 2003-2007 – RWJF:
(From the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Follow the link for the full report.)

“The number and proportion of Americans reporting going without or delaying needed medical care increased sharply between 2003 and 2007, according to findings from the Center for Studying Health System Change’s (HSC) nationally representative 2007 Health Tracking Household Survey. One in five Americans—59 million people—reported not getting or delaying needed medical care in 2007, up from one in seven—36 million people—in 2003. While access deteriorated for both insured and uninsured people, insured people experienced a larger relative increase in access problems compared with uninsured people. Moreover, access declined more for people in fair or poor health than for healthier people. In addition, unmet medical needs increased for low-income children, reversing earlier trends and widening the access gap with higher-income children. People reporting access problems increasingly cited cost as an obstacle to needed care, along with rising rates of health plan and health system barriers.”

CITY HEALTH CLINICS NEED A BOOSTER SHOT | Philadelphia Daily News | 04/04/2008

CITY HEALTH CLINICS NEED A BOOSTER SHOT Philadelphia Daily News 04/04/2008:

“How they don’t work: The system is far from perfect. According to a report released by the Philadelphia Unemployment Project last year, it can take up to five months to schedule an appointment with a doctor at a health center. Advocates say the centers need to extend evening hours and add staff to shorten waiting times. The mayor’s proposed funding increase is supposed to deal with some of these issues.
One of the biggest challenges that health centers face is offering competitive salaries to attract qualified staff.

The salaries offered by the city for three critical positions – pharmacists, dentists and physicians – are relatively low when compared to industry averages.

The highest-paid pharmacist working for the city makes $77,013 – well below the national median of $103,000. The same is true for dentists who work for the city. A typical dentist makes $130,000 a year. That’s significantly more than the $95,630 made by the highest-paid dentists at city health centers.

The largest discrepancy can found in the salary paid to doctors. The average physician working in a family practice makes $204,000. The highest-paid physician working for the city makes $109,820 – a difference of more that $94,000.”

Just had to post this for all of those who insist we don’t have to wait for healthcare in America and that “everyoine in America has access to health care.”

Drawing Lots for Health Care -[Oregon] New York Times

Drawing Lots for Health Care – New York Times:

“Last month, right after he had the heart attack and then the heart surgery and then started receiving the medical bills that so far have topped $200,000, Melvin Tsosies joined the 91,000 other residents of Oregon who had signed up for a lottery that provides health insurance to people who lack it.

Melvin Tsosies is among Oregonians who signed up for a health insurance lottery. “They said they’re going to draw names, and if I’m on that list, then I’ll get health care,” said Mr. Tsosies, 58, a handyman here in booming Deschutes County. “So I’m just waiting right now.”

Despite the great hopes of people like Mr. Tsosies, only a few thousand of Oregon’s 600,000 uninsured residents are likely to benefit from the lottery anytime soon. The program has only enough money to pay for about 24,000 people, and at least 17,000 slots are already filled.”

further down…

“Oregon once sought to serve a far larger population of those in need.
It has been more than a decade since the innovative Oregon Health Plan became a forerunner of state health care reform as it pursued universal health coverage. Conceived on a restaurant napkin in the late 1980s, the program had by 1996 reduced the number of the uninsured to about 11 percent of all residents, down from more than 18 percent in 1992. But then, early in this decade, the state endured a wrenching recession.
“Oregon was way ahead of everyone else,” said Charla DeHate, the interim executive director of Ochoco Health Systems. “And then we went broke.” “

Top o’ the world, Ma!

Most Republicans Think the U.S. Health Care System is the Best in the World. Democrats Disagree. – March 20, 2008 -2008 Releases – Press Releases – Harvard School of Public Health

Most Republicans Think the U.S. Health Care System is the Best in the World. Democrats Disagree. – March 20, 2008 -2008 Releases – Press Releases – Harvard School of Public Health:

“A recent survey by the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and Harris Interactive, as part of their ongoing series, Debating Health: Election 2008, finds that Americans are generally split on the issue of whether the United States has the best health care system in the world (45% believe the U.S. has the best system; 39% believe other countries have better systems; 15% don’t know or refused to answer) and that there is a significant divide along party lines. Nearly seven-in-ten Republicans (68%) believe the U.S. health care system is the best in the world, compared to just three in ten (32%) Democrats and four in ten (40%) Independents who feel the same way.”

The survey results are here.

Crooks and Liars » 60 Minutes: Charity Trying To Make Up For Failing U.S. Health Care System

Crooks and Liars » 60 Minutes: Charity Trying To Make Up For Failing U.S. Health Care System

“If you’re looking for a story that shows the abysmal state of health care in America, look no further. 60 Minutes traveled to Knoxville, TN to film a free clinic set up by a charity group called Remote Area Medical Volunteer Corps, or RAM. The charity was initially started in the 90’s by it’s founder, Stan Brock, former co-star of Wild Kingdom, to give health care relief to remote areas of Latin America, but after watching this segment it’s clear that America’s health care system doesn’t look too much different than that of a third world country.”

The video of the 60 Minutes story is available for viewing at the C&L site and it is definitely worth watching, if only to count the thousands of anecdotes available for those who like that sort of thing.

In a related anecdote, a patient I saw today with (now) advanced lung cancer, who had this gem in his history and physical: “He developed severe, unremitting left sided chest pain beneath his clavicle and along his left anterior chest about 4 to 5 months ago. He did not seek medical attention due to lack of health insurance.”

Most Minnesota doctors like single-payer health care, academic study finds | Twin Cities Daily Planet | Minneapolis – St. Paul

Most Minnesota doctors like single-payer health care, academic study finds Twin Cities Daily Planet Minneapolis – St. Paul:

“In his years as a physician, he has seen a sharp change in how physicians look at health care. “Having lunch with other doctors used to mean listening to conservatives griping about the government. Now lunchroom talk is that single-payer would be a good idea,” said Adair.

A recent survey through the University of Minnesota and St. Olaf College found that 64 percent of Minnesota’s physicians support a single-payer system much like the Minnesota Health Plan. Another 25 percent said that health savings accounts were the way to go, and only 12 percent thought that the current system of managed care was adequate.

“I personally feel very angry and frustrated when I know my patients are not getting the care that they deserve,” said Dr. Elizabeth Frost, a supporter of the Minnesota Health Plan. “I hate saying to people, ‘you need this test or this study,’ all the while knowing they don’t have insurance and likely don’t have a lot of savings either.”

Of the reasons that a single-payer system is so attractive to the majority of physicians in Minnesota is that the current multi-payer, managed-care system often gets in the way of physicians’ ability to provide the care that they swore an oath to provide.”

The following point is also made:

“Because of [these] barriers people often under-use the system, “as opposed to the overuse that people erroneously cite as a significant problem in the current system,” said Settgast. “This under-use leads to unnecessary human suffering and also financial waste because the cost of caring for a patient with a stroke far exceeds the cost of effectively managing someone’s high blood pressure.”

Please click on “Moral Hazard” (along the right of this blog) to see more about that last point. But the bigger point is true in my expereince too: physicians are tired of this “system” we now have and are ready to take a chance on change. It would make an interesting poll for the AMA to undertake…

UPDATE: The findings section of the paper, from Minnesota Medicine.
Findings A majority of respondents (72%) were male with a median medical school graduation year of 1979. Nearly half (46%) practiced primary medicine, followed by medical specialty (35%), surgical specialty (12%), and general surgery (6%). More than three-quarters (79%) worked in a metropolitan setting, and nearly two-thirds (65%) practiced in a clinic.
Of the 390 respondents who answered the question about which financing system would offer the best health care to the greatest number of people for a fixed amount of money, 64% said they favor a single-payer financing system, 25% preferred HSAs, and only 12% preferred managed care (Figure 1). Figures 2, 3 and 4 offer a closer look at who prefers those financing structures by sex, geographic location, specialty, and type of practice.
A single-payer system was favored by women physicians over men (female, 76%; male, 59%; p=.003); more male physicians than female preferred HSAs (male, 30%; female, 16%; p=.004). The percentage of male respondents who favored the current managed care system slightly exceeded that of female physicians (12% versus 9%; p=.553).
Geographic setting was also significantly associated across the 3 choices. Urban physicians favored a single-payer system over their rural and suburban colleagues (71%, 60%, and 54%, respectively; p=.009). Rural physicians preferred HSAs over suburban and urban physicians (34%, 32%, 17%; p=.002). Managed care garnered less than 15% support overall, with 14% of suburban physicians, 12% of urban doctors, and 6% of rural respondents favoring it; p=.217). Thus, urban physicians had the most support for a single-payer system and the least for managed care. Rural physicians were relatively enthusiastic for HSAs but least supportive of managed care.
When looking at physicians’ responses across medical specialty, those practicing primary medicine most favored a single-payer system (74%); general surgeons least favored such a system (36%). Conversely, general surgeons most favored HSAs (55%), and primary medicine physicians least favored them (20%). Managed care found greatest support among physicians who practiced a medical or surgical specialty (17% each) and the least among those who practiced primary medicine (6%). Of those who favored managed care, the significant split was specialists over generalists (17% and 7%; p=.001).
Physicians also were asked who should be responsible for providing access to health care. Nearly all (86%) believed it is the responsibility of society through government to ensure access to good medical care for all, regardless of ability to pay. Only 41% held that the private insurance industry should continue to play a major role in medical care financing and delivery.
Using a regression model, we found that physicians who agreed that it is the government’s responsibility to ensure access to medical care were significantly more likely to favor a single-payer financing system (OR 13.51; CI 2.85, 64.15; p=.001). Those who believed the private insurance industry should continue to play a major role in financing medical care were significantly less likely to favor a government-run system (OR 3.45; CI 1.35, 8.33; p=.009